Comments on: Songza: Would you like a habituatable pie-menus with your social music?

By: zmoothg

zmoothg — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:05:39 +0000

I think http://www.flashwidgetz.com is better and it allows you to store your playlist. There music search tends to return better results than songza also.

By: Bollysite

Bollysite — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 03:57:20 +0000

Try to create huge playlist !!

Client side heap will be screwed up!

By: Tony V

Tony V — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:50:51 +0000

forget even violating YouTube TOS.Unless there are legal agreements in place with the publishers of those songs it could possibly be copyright violation as well.

How are the publishers/artists who’s songs are being played being compensated? Do they have agreements with ASCAP, SESAC, or BMI?

How much of those songs are legally on You Tube in the first place.

I haven’t even been able to find artists like the Beatles on LEGAL sites like Napster or in a Legal Juke box at a bar, and I am to believe they are legally streaming Beatles songs for free?

By: Peter Mularien

Peter Mularien — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:02:52 +0000

@Cron You should check out the easyGestures Firefox add-on, and its older sibling, RadialContext. Once you use them, it's hard to go back to traditional right-click menus.

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:53:52 +0000

@ Michael

You don’t think the YouTube API is their “explicitly authorized means” ? It looks that way to me.

By: Cron

Cron — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:55:49 +0000

Pie menu is neat – first time ever really coming across it before in an application, and could see how it’d be really useful.

That aside, gets a big “meh” from me. So, I type in Spastik – and I get to hear a 27 distorted clip of Hawtin playing Spastik at a party. Really now – that’s useful (not).

I’m more impressed by say – seeqpod for simple music-finding ability. (Although not a fan of the interface at all)

By: Chris Phillips

Chris Phillips — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:51:17 +0000

Sorry this review may sound harsh but… it doesn’t meet even minimal Web 2.0 expectations of the back button working. For example, I search ‘Prince’ then get scared about actually playing one of those songs for fear the RIAA is watching me via their Sony trojan so I hit back to pull up my previous search. WACK! Back button don’t work (Firefox 2) or Back button takes me to the site before I visited Songza (Opera 9.24, Safari 3 and that Microsoft browser too). Bookmarking the page doesn’t save my search list etc. Also why is “Watch on YouTube” an option off the share menu – seems out of place to me as I don’t want to share it, just watch it. And no offense but your color scheme is really bad – it hurts my eyes, all the orange/red makes me angry, and roll over states are almost impossible to read on crappy monitors. For a self professed slick interface this leaves a lot to be desired. Did anyone on the team have a graphic design background?

By: Con

Con — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:47:17 +0000

The article focuses mainly on the UI and Ajax experience. Not how they stream videos from youtube and etc. No one asked for your comment on how they stream the music.

By: Harry Hopkins

Harry Hopkins — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:05:03 +0000

This widget is functional and thought out with regards to its purpose. However, I think Aza is doing himself and his work a disservice by using so much jargon in his messages. I expected, based on the description, to be wowed and engrossed in the site for the next 30 minutes. But felt a sense of ‘that’s it?’ after about a minute. It’s certainly something to be proud of, but not necessarily inspiring. My mental image is of a son begging his dad to put his work on the front of the web 2.0 fridge. He didn’t deliver on the expectation in my opinion.

By: Will Peavy

Will Peavy — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:44:36 +0000

The interface is, as advertised, easy to use. I wonder why they made the widget background color so similar to the body background color? It seems that it would be easier to use if the widget color were more distinguishable from the body.

By: Ed Knittel

Ed Knittel — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:22:25 +0000

@Cal: I don’t think it’s a cage getting rattled. It’s just hard to take Aza and Scott so seriously when a lot of us are left scratching our heads and asking “So, what did you do exactly?”

“Songza lets you listen to any song or band.” Really?

It’s more like “Songza lets you listen to crappy compressed audio of a crappy compressed video illegally uploaded to YouTube. And by any song or band we mean just the ones that aren’t on a major record label.” Or did I miss the big announcement that said YouTube was given exclusive rights to freely distribute the music libraries of the members of the RIAA and that Songza was told they could piggyback off if it?

I still stand by my 2 weeks prediction.

By: Cal Jacobson

Cal Jacobson — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:55:50 +0000

Holy crap, somebody rattled the monkey cage today.

By: Paul

Paul — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:46:04 +0000

What have you done Daniel? Donut?

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:45:54 +0000

@ Joe

What about this:

4. C. You agree not to access User Submissions (defined below) or YouTube Content through any technology or means other than the video playback pages of the Website itself, the YouTube Embeddable Player, or other explicitly authorized means YouTube may designate.

By: Joe

Joe — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:06:12 +0000

@ Daniel
Have you read their ToS? Where do you see this infringing their terms? Or anyone else for that matter?

By: Daniel

Daniel — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:32:15 +0000

Wow, I digg, you’re pretty superficial. Do you think it’s hard to design an interface like that? Or to even write one? Honestly, the idea of using only audio from YouTube videos has been apparent ever since people have been making those mashups and music videos on there. There’s nothing clever about it, it’s not fluid, not cool, and certainly not practical.

It’s a good idea on the outside, but if you actually take time to see why it can be a bad idea, it is. I can’t wait until they take this down.

I love how the ‘about’ page calls this thing the “brainchild” of some fellow with a bunch of credentials. Are you telling me the only thing that guy can come up with is a cheesey search tool that breaks YouTube’s TOS?

Honestly.

By: I digg

I digg — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:14:09 +0000

I love how the untalented bash this sort of thing. Its an awesome interface. and its a clever use of the YouTube api? How many of you have created something this cool, fluid, and practical?

By: Ilian Hristov

Ilian Hristov — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:16:01 +0000

What a nice way to waste bandwidth AND listen to music.

May almost seem like something legal, but will trigger some discussions.

By: Scott Schiller

Scott Schiller — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:15:24 +0000

I think the UI is sort of neat, intentionally different by design and so on. It may seem a bit wacky, but this is the sort of thing that inspires people to think differently when designing UI elements and interaction stuff.

By: Ed Knittel

Ed Knittel — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:15:28 +0000

They are only as successful as YouTube allows them to be. I checked out Songza pre-launch and aside from the uncluttered look I failed to see what the fuss was all about. It’s a YouTube playlist that in theory you can share with others. However, I was unable to successfully embed the code into my personal site so that the player would play the selected song – it just didn’t want to play.

I’m also not sure what happens if/when a file gets yanked from YouTube. I doubt that the embeddable player gives the user any indication of this as it’s completely transparent that they are using the YouTube API. Nowhere on the website do they mention where this seemingly free, copyrighted music is coming from. I’m a little cautious as to why that is.

I give it a 2 weeks before we hear about Songza being in some sort of legal trouble. By that time I’ll be back to Pandora again.