Comments on: Sun’s Project Flair: Ajax without the DOM, CSS, HTML, er wait

By: Philip Weaver

Philip Weaver — Sat, 04 Aug 2007 23:18:47 +0000

I’m a Java Swing fanboy and it sounds like I’ll be interested in Flair when it arrives. IMO, GWT has missed it’s mark but having a styling API instead of requiring CSS. Until Flair arrives, the closest this I see to it is Qooxdoo 0.7.x @ http://www.qooxdoo.org/ – code directly in JavaScript – no need for any CSS or HTML.

By: Ryan Gahl

Ryan Gahl — Mon, 07 May 2007 16:16:16 +0000

OK OK, he’s not a quack :-), sorry Dan. What I meant to say is, “…this guy’s using the word junky incorrectly when using it to refer to web design principles in comparison to desktop graphics models for application development, as the web model allows for essentially lookless controls with design an implementation clearly and cleanly separated. For shame”

By: Maury

Maury — Wed, 02 May 2007 23:42:31 +0000

“what you would call, sort of, collaborative object development, that kind of thing”

What in the sweet christmas cake does THAT mean? “Sort of collaborative object devlopment?” Sort of..how?

By: Brad Neuberg

Brad Neuberg — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:11:59 +0000

Wow, Dan invented some pretty amazing stuff: bitblit is the basic way bits are blitted to the screen fast enough so that we can have graphical user-interfaces, while Smalltalk is the granddaddy of the WIMP UI and OOP coding (that and Simula). I’m sure this kernel will have all sorts of late-binding goodness that lets folks do some crazy stuff — my only question is if the performance of the JS runtimes in current browsers is fast enough to build another abstraction layer, but since Dan has built fast virtual machines before I’m sure he’s thinking about this kinda stuff. He’s gotta respect the basic tenets of open source though: 1) show us the source! and 2) release early and release often. Neither has happened yet….

Best,
Brad Neuberg

By: Brad Neuberg

Brad Neuberg — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 22:08:00 +0000

I think this sounds cool; I’d love to know more details though — the article is very light on actually knowing what he is building. I always support revisiting what we assume is true to try a different direction — some times it turns out to be much better than the assumptions we currently carry.

Dan, email me with more details: bkn3@columbia.edu

Best,
Brad Neuberg

By: Vance Dubberly

Vance Dubberly — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:25:34 +0000

2 things. 1) I’m amazed that anybody would defend web technologies such as CSS and HTML in the context of Application Development. They are great for publishing ( which is their lineage ) but are amazingly inefficient and confusing tools for Applications. Literally, using them to build applications is turning their intended use on it’s head. 2) Why is this story a story? It’s barely a vague rumor.

By: carmen

carmen — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:14:03 +0000

well, he was sort of stirring up a bees nest with those comments passing off virtually all web related technology as ‘junky’…

By: cdr

cdr — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:08:50 +0000

if theyre abstracting away XHTML, the DOM, CSS, AJAX, and letting you write an app in a simple manner in Javsascript, all from one place (the server?, the client?) that could be cool…

but i don’t have my hopes up – what do they mean web kernel? boot up into a self-hosting JS kernel, LISP-machine style? im sure this project will devolve from its lofty goals into some GWT-clone in Rhino or something..

By: Jim Grandy

Jim Grandy — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:56:34 +0000

Dan Ingalls is a researcher, and a distinguished one at that. I think he deserves better from the Ajaxian crowd than this. For more information, google “Dan Ingalls Smalltalk”, or read his Wikipedia bio (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Ingalls). Among other things, he invented the bitblt primitive, and managed the Smalltalk-80 project at PARC.

By: Joe Larson

Joe Larson — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:33:57 +0000

Flair is not a great project name choice when your company name is Sun. http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&q=sun+flair hmmm… is this an astronomy project?

By: k

Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:59:00 +0000

For those of you who are clued into corporate speak, let me break down this blog quota filling post: a guy in SUN LABS (yes, the research part of Sun) is INVESTIGATING something that “could spawn various new product concepts.”

ITS A RESEARCH PROJECT, so go back to your homes and put away your pitchforks.

Dion and the editors, please find something really newsworthy to post.

By: Ryan Gahl

Ryan Gahl — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:26:00 +0000

quote: “but underneath itâ€™s still all this junky HTML, Document Object Model, CSS, all that stuff, where 30 years ago, we knew how to do that stuff cleanly with a dynamic programming language and a simple graphics modelâ€

junky HTML, DOM, and CSS eh? XHTML Markup and cascading styles are far far far better suited to design than the “simple graphics model” of old… this guy’s a quack. Who in there right mind would trade expressive, declarative, fluid, cascading design for explicit crap. Desktop graphics models should copy the web paradigm, not the other way around. MS actually has it right there, with WPF’s XML approach.

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:15:10 +0000

Lame. The link is to an article in some magazine for suits. Show me the code, and if not that, something that will actually let me evaluate this beyond just what some talking head is willing to print about it.

By: Oscar Emilio Antolinez C

Oscar Emilio Antolinez C — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:42:20 +0000

Las grandes compaÃ±Ãas deberÃan unir esfuerzos para crear una tecnologÃa estÃ¡ndar, cada vez tenemos mas lenguajes de programaciÃ³n, aplaudo la innovaciÃ³n, pero siento que por tantos esfuerzos divididos no desarrollamos por completo el potencial de los lenguajes existentes.