<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week in HTML 5: Clickjacking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/this-week-in-html-5-clickjacking/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/this-week-in-html-5-clickjacking</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:30:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shadedecho</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/this-week-in-html-5-clickjacking/comment-page-1#comment-267842</link>
		<dc:creator>shadedecho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4633#comment-267842</guid>
		<description>on this topic of flash being &quot;so bad&quot; with its immature security model -- this is such a tired, over-used argument. The 9.0.124 version of the player has addressed most (but certainly not all) of the major concerns with the security model. While providing a flexible but powerful model for flash communication authorization, indeed it&#039;s also been leveraged for other communication (including Silverlight), and it paves a way for the pattern that other similar approaches can take.  In addition, since Adobe&#039;s been at this part of the game for a couple of years now, there&#039;s a good chance that they&#039;re not just &quot;immature&quot; at it like most people seem to want to believe.
.
Man Adobe bashing (especially without much backing) really gets old after awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on this topic of flash being &#8220;so bad&#8221; with its immature security model &#8212; this is such a tired, over-used argument. The 9.0.124 version of the player has addressed most (but certainly not all) of the major concerns with the security model. While providing a flexible but powerful model for flash communication authorization, indeed it&#8217;s also been leveraged for other communication (including Silverlight), and it paves a way for the pattern that other similar approaches can take.  In addition, since Adobe&#8217;s been at this part of the game for a couple of years now, there&#8217;s a good chance that they&#8217;re not just &#8220;immature&#8221; at it like most people seem to want to believe.<br />
.<br />
Man Adobe bashing (especially without much backing) really gets old after awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bander</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/this-week-in-html-5-clickjacking/comment-page-1#comment-267761</link>
		<dc:creator>bander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=4633#comment-267761</guid>
		<description>Wow, I saw this on /. last week, but I hadn&#039;t realized how bad the attack is with Javascript enabled. Thanks for including Giorgio&#039;s explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I saw this on /. last week, but I hadn&#8217;t realized how bad the attack is with Javascript enabled. Thanks for including Giorgio&#8217;s explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
