Comments on: Web API authentication for mashups http://ajaxian.com/archives/web-api-authentication-for-mashups Cleaning up the web with Ajax Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: Jeffrey McManus http://ajaxian.com/archives/web-api-authentication-for-mashups/comment-page-1#comment-43864 Jeffrey McManus Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:31:10 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/web-api-authentication-for-mashups#comment-43864 bbauth is both an authentication and an authorization technique but it's not an API and it's not intended to be a single signon solution. It's simply intended to be a way to create web sites that use yahoo APIs that use authentication. We should also make clear that this isn't publicly available yet -- it should become available with the release of the photos API that we announced back in March. bbauth is both an authentication and an authorization technique but it’s not an API and it’s not intended to be a single signon solution. It’s simply intended to be a way to create web sites that use yahoo APIs that use authentication.

We should also make clear that this isn’t publicly available yet — it should become available with the release of the photos API that we announced back in March.

]]> By: Julien Couvreur http://ajaxian.com/archives/web-api-authentication-for-mashups/comment-page-1#comment-43826 Julien Couvreur Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:16:46 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/web-api-authentication-for-mashups#comment-43826 Hi Chris, I'd like to clarify that I'm not working on bbauth. We've had some discussion on the topic with Jason, and I'm trying to piece the puzzle together with the little info I have. My post should be considered largely speculation on bbauth at this point, although I believe the high-level arguments still stand. Cheers, Julien Hi Chris,

I’d like to clarify that I’m not working on bbauth. We’ve had some discussion on the topic with Jason, and I’m trying to piece the puzzle together with the little info I have. My post should be considered largely speculation on bbauth at this point, although I believe the high-level arguments still stand.

Cheers,
Julien

]]>