Comments on: WebGL available in Firefox Nightly

By: Autohandel

Autohandel — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:40:01 +0000

I agree with Jadet, I think O3D is better than this.

By: ShawnK

ShawnK — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:44:39 +0000

I find all this rather interesting.
As much as I’d like to see an MMO built using WebGL, it almost pains me thinking of how much processing must be done to accomplish such a task using JavaScript.

In other aspects, this could be a great movement as 3D displays are becoming more mainstream.

By: aussieajax

aussieajax — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:54:55 +0000

God. Tirsen is going to get so much *love* tonight. Keke

By: spongeh

spongeh — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:45:02 +0000

It’s not quite that easy with multiplayer games.

By: eyelidlessness

eyelidlessness — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:15:28 +0000

okonomiyaki3000, Who cares if people cheat? From a developer’s perspective, it’s meaningless; from a social perspective, people will just stop playing with them.

By: jblanche

jblanche — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:14:23 +0000

Is there any demo page to see this “in real life” and inspect the code ?

By: Jadet

Jadet — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:07:48 +0000

@Darkimmortal: nah, O3D requires a plugin

By: Darkimmortal

Darkimmortal — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:01:14 +0000

O3D is in every way possible better than this.

By: Jadet

Jadet — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:25:53 +0000

Great news, now let’s see how long Opera is going to stay behind.

@okonomiyaki3000: Javascript can take care of that with closures.

By: okonomiyaki3000

okonomiyaki3000 — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:20:50 +0000

I am looking forward to games and other stuff that is currently owned by Flash being done directly in canvas and js but, for that to happen, don’t we need a way to lock down our code so that giving yourself a million lives is a bit trickier than just pushing “up-up-down-down-left-right-left-right-Open Firebug”?