<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Would World Wide Web Developers Do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maximum Source Website - Internet ReSource &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Would World Wide Web Developers Do?</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do/comment-page-1#comment-47670</link>
		<dc:creator>Maximum Source Website - Internet ReSource &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What Would World Wide Web Developers Do?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do#comment-47670</guid>
		<description>[...] More: continued here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More: continued here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: linb</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do/comment-page-1#comment-29340</link>
		<dc:creator>linb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do#comment-29340</guid>
		<description>It seemed like only IE and firefox will be winner in this area.  They are supported in most of modern framework, such as &lt;a&gt;dojo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linb.net/linb&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jsLINB&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seemed like only IE and firefox will be winner in this area.  They are supported in most of modern framework, such as <a>dojo</a>, <a href="http://www.linb.net/linb" rel="nofollow">jsLINB</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AsbjÃ¸rn Clemmensen</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do/comment-page-1#comment-28987</link>
		<dc:creator>AsbjÃ¸rn Clemmensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do#comment-28987</guid>
		<description>Hmm, well one might want to consider the code examples on W3Schools - they all cater to IE technologies (XML Data Islands, ActiveXObject) without mentioning alternatives that would actually enable your code to work in other browsers.
It&#039;s quite possible that I&#039;ve missed some articles to the contrary, but W3Schools is definitely not a reliable source for web developer stats, in my humble opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, well one might want to consider the code examples on W3Schools &#8211; they all cater to IE technologies (XML Data Islands, ActiveXObject) without mentioning alternatives that would actually enable your code to work in other browsers.<br />
It&#8217;s quite possible that I&#8217;ve missed some articles to the contrary, but W3Schools is definitely not a reliable source for web developer stats, in my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Mahemoff</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do/comment-page-1#comment-28970</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Mahemoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 01:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do#comment-28970</guid>
		<description>I posted stats for AjaxPatterns.org at http://www.softwareas.com/what-browsers-do-developers-use

IE 46.8%, FF 36.2%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted stats for AjaxPatterns.org at <a href="http://www.softwareas.com/what-browsers-do-developers-use" rel="nofollow">http://www.softwareas.com/what-browsers-do-developers-use</a></p>
<p>IE 46.8%, FF 36.2%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dietrich Kappe</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do/comment-page-1#comment-28609</link>
		<dc:creator>Dietrich Kappe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/archives/what-would-world-wide-web-developers-do#comment-28609</guid>
		<description>On blogs.pathf.com I see over 60% of visitors using Firefox with 6% Safari and 5% Opera. Part of that may be explained by the AJAX blog, part by the user experience design blog (lots of Mac users), and maybe another part (the large number of Linux users) by the presence of the infrastructure blog. It&#039;s certainly not a typical web audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On blogs.pathf.com I see over 60% of visitors using Firefox with 6% Safari and 5% Opera. Part of that may be explained by the AJAX blog, part by the user experience design blog (lots of Mac users), and maybe another part (the large number of Linux users) by the presence of the infrastructure blog. It&#8217;s certainly not a typical web audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

