<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where is Firefox on Acid 3? Here.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/where-is-firefox-on-acid-3-here/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/where-is-firefox-on-acid-3-here</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon43</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/where-is-firefox-on-acid-3-here/comment-page-1#comment-262465</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon43</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3482#comment-262465</guid>
		<description>@JonathanLeech: Have you any clue what you just said?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JonathanLeech: Have you any clue what you just said?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/where-is-firefox-on-acid-3-here/comment-page-1#comment-262420</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3482#comment-262420</guid>
		<description>&quot;The order in which browsers have â€œsuccessfullyâ€ achieved ACID 3 compliance is the exact opposite order you can count on them to successfully render a website.&quot;

Really? My experience has been that, except in cases of targeting specific browser bugs, Safari is generally equivalent to Firefox or better in terms of &quot;reliable&quot; rendering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The order in which browsers have â€œsuccessfullyâ€ achieved ACID 3 compliance is the exact opposite order you can count on them to successfully render a website.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? My experience has been that, except in cases of targeting specific browser bugs, Safari is generally equivalent to Firefox or better in terms of &#8220;reliable&#8221; rendering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonathanLeech</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/where-is-firefox-on-acid-3-here/comment-page-1#comment-262408</link>
		<dc:creator>JonathanLeech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3482#comment-262408</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with the sentiments. The whole ACID 3 race reminds me of the lengths video card companies in the 90s went to, tweaking their cards to score impressive results on artificial benchmarks. The order in which browsers have &quot;successfully&quot; achieved ACID 3 compliance is the exact opposite order you can count on them to successfully render a website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with the sentiments. The whole ACID 3 race reminds me of the lengths video card companies in the 90s went to, tweaking their cards to score impressive results on artificial benchmarks. The order in which browsers have &#8220;successfully&#8221; achieved ACID 3 compliance is the exact opposite order you can count on them to successfully render a website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradNeuberg</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/where-is-firefox-on-acid-3-here/comment-page-1#comment-262381</link>
		<dc:creator>BradNeuberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3482#comment-262381</guid>
		<description>I love how he&#039;s telling Ian Hixie that Acid 3 doesn&#039;t have enough HTML 5 stuff in it.... when Ian is the one that is leading the HTML 5 effort! Ian just realized that Acid 3 was focused on a different baseline of browser features and it wasn&#039;t appropriate to put HTML 5 stuff in that at this time.

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how he&#8217;s telling Ian Hixie that Acid 3 doesn&#8217;t have enough HTML 5 stuff in it&#8230;. when Ian is the one that is leading the HTML 5 effort! Ian just realized that Acid 3 was focused on a different baseline of browser features and it wasn&#8217;t appropriate to put HTML 5 stuff in that at this time.</p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starkraving</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/where-is-firefox-on-acid-3-here/comment-page-1#comment-262379</link>
		<dc:creator>starkraving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3482#comment-262379</guid>
		<description>It does seem a little standoffish doesn&#039;t? They&#039;re constantly making changes to their software, just the same as Safari and Opera. If they&#039;re currently focusing their changes on support for HTML5 then that&#039;s cool with me, I&#039;m pretty sure I&#039;m not using anything in my code that is affected by the failure of the Acid test. They should just say that compliance of the test is in the books and leave it with that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does seem a little standoffish doesn&#8217;t? They&#8217;re constantly making changes to their software, just the same as Safari and Opera. If they&#8217;re currently focusing their changes on support for HTML5 then that&#8217;s cool with me, I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;m not using anything in my code that is affected by the failure of the Acid test. They should just say that compliance of the test is in the books and leave it with that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tj111</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/where-is-firefox-on-acid-3-here/comment-page-1#comment-262376</link>
		<dc:creator>tj111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=3482#comment-262376</guid>
		<description>I think a &#039;we are too late in the dev cycle for Firefox 3 to push through compliance for Acid3&#039; would have been sufficient.  Developers understand you can&#039;t make large changes to the underlying infrastructure this late in the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a &#8216;we are too late in the dev cycle for Firefox 3 to push through compliance for Acid3&#8242; would have been sufficient.  Developers understand you can&#8217;t make large changes to the underlying infrastructure this late in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

