<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why choose Dojo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Philipov</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-256461</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Philipov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-256461</guid>
		<description>As a web-designer (and not web-developer) I&#039;m just trying to find me the perfect solution for some basic AJAX functionality and I&#039;m very, very puzzled whether I should choose Mootools, Prototype, JQuery, YUI...I used Mootols for its SlimBox image popup, but what I&#039;m really seeking is a framework which has more , erm, features, add-ons - call it whatever you want. And one other thing - why noone mentions Spry from Adobe - because there is no official release yet or you guys just didn&#039;t had the time to test it? I would love to hear some comments on Spry, as it is integrated into DW CS3 - something that makes us, poor web-designers relatively happy :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a web-designer (and not web-developer) I&#8217;m just trying to find me the perfect solution for some basic AJAX functionality and I&#8217;m very, very puzzled whether I should choose Mootools, Prototype, JQuery, YUI&#8230;I used Mootols for its SlimBox image popup, but what I&#8217;m really seeking is a framework which has more , erm, features, add-ons &#8211; call it whatever you want. And one other thing &#8211; why noone mentions Spry from Adobe &#8211; because there is no official release yet or you guys just didn&#8217;t had the time to test it? I would love to hear some comments on Spry, as it is integrated into DW CS3 &#8211; something that makes us, poor web-designers relatively happy :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-255262</link>
		<dc:creator>ziggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-255262</guid>
		<description>Why does dojo insist on the type of loading that completely seizes up firefox for a few seconds? I hate sites using it for that reason alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does dojo insist on the type of loading that completely seizes up firefox for a few seconds? I hate sites using it for that reason alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoffe</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-254099</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 15:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-254099</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only tried the examples on the Dojo homepage now and then, and they take forever to load and start (first one, then the other). If the developers themselves can&#039;t make responsive example applications, chances are noone else can, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only tried the examples on the Dojo homepage now and then, and they take forever to load and start (first one, then the other). If the developers themselves can&#8217;t make responsive example applications, chances are noone else can, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DT</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252664</link>
		<dc:creator>DT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252664</guid>
		<description>Some thoughts on what would help the marketing of Dojo... I hope the Dojo devs seriously consider publishing &quot;sneak preview apps/samples&quot; of Dojo 0.9 live on their site (ideally, under the &quot;Demos&quot; link).  I had to dig into the 0.9 beta release&#039;s code to find some test pages which illustrated some but not all of the new stuff (which does look very nice to me, I might note).  If you want to convince people of how good your candy is, you should really show them the goods and give &#039;em a taste, even if it is still a bit limited at this point.  

They should also seriously consider creating a page (easily found from the top-level page) of &quot;here&#039;s where it&#039;s used&quot; links and screenshots, to really get people thinking not just about &quot;well, what can you do&quot;, but &quot;who&#039;s using it?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some thoughts on what would help the marketing of Dojo&#8230; I hope the Dojo devs seriously consider publishing &#8220;sneak preview apps/samples&#8221; of Dojo 0.9 live on their site (ideally, under the &#8220;Demos&#8221; link).  I had to dig into the 0.9 beta release&#8217;s code to find some test pages which illustrated some but not all of the new stuff (which does look very nice to me, I might note).  If you want to convince people of how good your candy is, you should really show them the goods and give &#8216;em a taste, even if it is still a bit limited at this point.  </p>
<p>They should also seriously consider creating a page (easily found from the top-level page) of &#8220;here&#8217;s where it&#8217;s used&#8221; links and screenshots, to really get people thinking not just about &#8220;well, what can you do&#8221;, but &#8220;who&#8217;s using it?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252645</link>
		<dc:creator>RH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252645</guid>
		<description>(1 more try) ... (0.4.x) being bloated is correct, though, and the argument of it having bad documentation is, if anything, understated!  The lack of documentation, especially in light of the size of the code, was killer and the main reason people &#039;avoided it like the plague&#039;.
Dojo 1.0 will correct all of this --IF-- it works out as planned.  It is undergoing a major/complete rewrite, and has to be completely documented (which, going by the mailing list, was fiercely resisted by the contributors before).  So, we can&#039;t really evaluate Dojo yet...we&#039;ll have to wait for 1.0.  Hopefully it will be as great as the design specifies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1 more try) &#8230; (0.4.x) being bloated is correct, though, and the argument of it having bad documentation is, if anything, understated!  The lack of documentation, especially in light of the size of the code, was killer and the main reason people &#8216;avoided it like the plague&#8217;.<br />
Dojo 1.0 will correct all of this &#8211;IF&#8211; it works out as planned.  It is undergoing a major/complete rewrite, and has to be completely documented (which, going by the mailing list, was fiercely resisted by the contributors before).  So, we can&#8217;t really evaluate Dojo yet&#8230;we&#8217;ll have to wait for 1.0.  Hopefully it will be as great as the design specifies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252644</link>
		<dc:creator>RH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252644</guid>
		<description>(cont.)... (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(cont.)&#8230; (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RH</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252643</link>
		<dc:creator>RH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252643</guid>
		<description>As for the argument that Dojo has too many components:  nonsense!  A problem with, for example jQuery or the CPAN load of user-contributed files for perl, is that there is a lot of junk and untested code mixed in with the few good pieces; figuring out what is useful can waste a lot of time.  Far better to have more (tested) functionality, especially since a lot of it is optional in Dojo.
The argument of old dojo (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the argument that Dojo has too many components:  nonsense!  A problem with, for example jQuery or the CPAN load of user-contributed files for perl, is that there is a lot of junk and untested code mixed in with the few good pieces; figuring out what is useful can waste a lot of time.  Far better to have more (tested) functionality, especially since a lot of it is optional in Dojo.<br />
The argument of old dojo (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exoska</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252619</link>
		<dc:creator>exoska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252619</guid>
		<description>as a dojo example , please checkout one of the nicest sites on the net imho, http://www.imeem.com

also, not an advice for everyone, but if you checkout the dojo core, or some tiny widgets, you ll appreciate how cross-browser written it is. i ve touched some points, re-written some widgets for my app. it s even better for me.

again, imho , jquery is fine, prototype is cool i love all of em. they may be faster also. 

but dojo is a package. it s solid, runs in opera even in safari(well i know the editor2 ), you can re-compress the source online , after using the mighty shrinksafe(it rules). i m using many widgets on my app, so does imeem.com if you checkout. but, finally i agree that dojo is not for all. not for the moment at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a dojo example , please checkout one of the nicest sites on the net imho, <a href="http://www.imeem.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imeem.com</a></p>
<p>also, not an advice for everyone, but if you checkout the dojo core, or some tiny widgets, you ll appreciate how cross-browser written it is. i ve touched some points, re-written some widgets for my app. it s even better for me.</p>
<p>again, imho , jquery is fine, prototype is cool i love all of em. they may be faster also. </p>
<p>but dojo is a package. it s solid, runs in opera even in safari(well i know the editor2 ), you can re-compress the source online , after using the mighty shrinksafe(it rules). i m using many widgets on my app, so does imeem.com if you checkout. but, finally i agree that dojo is not for all. not for the moment at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: morriz</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252531</link>
		<dc:creator>morriz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252531</guid>
		<description>@ppl (like Vladimir) that don&#039;t investigate their options thoroughly:

I have tried all the frameworks, and have had the pleasure of building a full fledged JS app.The Dojo ppl simply try to make good code in my opinion. It IS loading only the minimum bytes needed ON DEMAND, supporting DEBUG mode. It supports all mechanisms that I want as an evolved programmer (mixins, inheritance etc). It&#039;s event mechanism is THE ONLY ONE for me.

In my opinion YUI is somewhere in the middle of hardcore JS coders and JS newbies trying to hack something fast. I think they&#039;re appeasing to ppl who like swing and such, doing things the programmatic way. Dojo provides for extendible markup, so it becomes the CONFIGURATION for your application. Simply have your html/css experts hack together a demo for your customers and add behaviour/ajax afterwards. Time to market improves drastically.

Just take what you want from it, when you want it, without the overhead :)

Alright, some critique I have too: 
- I must say that I prefer Dean Edward&#039;s Base class over Dojo&#039;s inheritance scheme, but only because it&#039;s too defferent from the way programmers are used to do inheritance.
- I also prefer Dean&#039;s css-query, for it abides to standards and supports css2 and css2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ppl (like Vladimir) that don&#8217;t investigate their options thoroughly:</p>
<p>I have tried all the frameworks, and have had the pleasure of building a full fledged JS app.The Dojo ppl simply try to make good code in my opinion. It IS loading only the minimum bytes needed ON DEMAND, supporting DEBUG mode. It supports all mechanisms that I want as an evolved programmer (mixins, inheritance etc). It&#8217;s event mechanism is THE ONLY ONE for me.</p>
<p>In my opinion YUI is somewhere in the middle of hardcore JS coders and JS newbies trying to hack something fast. I think they&#8217;re appeasing to ppl who like swing and such, doing things the programmatic way. Dojo provides for extendible markup, so it becomes the CONFIGURATION for your application. Simply have your html/css experts hack together a demo for your customers and add behaviour/ajax afterwards. Time to market improves drastically.</p>
<p>Just take what you want from it, when you want it, without the overhead :)</p>
<p>Alright, some critique I have too:<br />
- I must say that I prefer Dean Edward&#8217;s Base class over Dojo&#8217;s inheritance scheme, but only because it&#8217;s too defferent from the way programmers are used to do inheritance.<br />
- I also prefer Dean&#8217;s css-query, for it abides to standards and supports css2 and css2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252529</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252529</guid>
		<description>Why nobody never write posts like &quot;Why NOT chose Dojo&quot;? I will never use frameworks like this, especialy on JS with a lot of code which i will never use, but user should load this code to browser anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why nobody never write posts like &#8220;Why NOT chose Dojo&#8221;? I will never use frameworks like this, especialy on JS with a lot of code which i will never use, but user should load this code to browser anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Trenka</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252524</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Trenka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252524</guid>
		<description>@Mukul: you&#039;re referring to the 0.4.x branch.  Try any of these:
http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/dojotoolkit/dijit/tests/
...and see if that&#039;s still too slow for you to load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mukul: you&#8217;re referring to the 0.4.x branch.  Try any of these:<br />
<a href="http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/dojotoolkit/dijit/tests/" rel="nofollow">http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/dojotoolkit/dijit/tests/</a><br />
&#8230;and see if that&#8217;s still too slow for you to load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukul Kumar</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252517</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukul Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252517</guid>
		<description>I think DOJO is too slow to load. It gives good functionality, but for a simple web UI, I think it is too much. I have an https page that requires DOJO, and in the absense of browser side caching, dojo takes forever to load.

Mukul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think DOJO is too slow to load. It gives good functionality, but for a simple web UI, I think it is too much. I have an https page that requires DOJO, and in the absense of browser side caching, dojo takes forever to load.</p>
<p>Mukul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252511</link>
		<dc:creator>r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252511</guid>
		<description>thanks to all the dojo guys for taking the time to respond - i know how hard it can be when the peanut gallery wants instant change but the pace of development never matches :)

i&#039;ll be watching with interest to see how dojo 0.9 goes ... such a shame you guys didn&#039;t address this at an earlier stage, cause the last 3-4 months is when all the frameworks really took off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks to all the dojo guys for taking the time to respond &#8211; i know how hard it can be when the peanut gallery wants instant change but the pace of development never matches :)</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll be watching with interest to see how dojo 0.9 goes &#8230; such a shame you guys didn&#8217;t address this at an earlier stage, cause the last 3-4 months is when all the frameworks really took off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252506</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252506</guid>
		<description>Speaking to the concerns about download size and getting up and running with the toolkit:

If you do not like downloading and unpacking Dojo on your drive, you can use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://dojotoolkit.org/2007/07/04/dojo-0-9-0-beta-xdomain-build-now-available-aol-cdn&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dojo 0.9 beta from the AOL CDN&lt;/a&gt;. Just add a script tag and start experimenting. The xdomain 0.9 Dojo core served from the CDN is just 26KB gzipped too.

I definitely feel that pain on the lack of documentation and not having the API tool updated yet. I understand it is in the works, so hopefully that will get fleshed out sooner rather than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking to the concerns about download size and getting up and running with the toolkit:</p>
<p>If you do not like downloading and unpacking Dojo on your drive, you can use the <a href="http://dojotoolkit.org/2007/07/04/dojo-0-9-0-beta-xdomain-build-now-available-aol-cdn" rel="nofollow">Dojo 0.9 beta from the AOL CDN</a>. Just add a script tag and start experimenting. The xdomain 0.9 Dojo core served from the CDN is just 26KB gzipped too.</p>
<p>I definitely feel that pain on the lack of documentation and not having the API tool updated yet. I understand it is in the works, so hopefully that will get fleshed out sooner rather than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Trenka</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252504</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Trenka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252504</guid>
		<description>@r: Ah.  You&#039;re referring to the 0.4 branch.  AFAIK we&#039;re only providing one download for 0.9, and we&#039;ll be working hard to try to make it remain that way (since I completely agree with you about the whole 20 editions thing ;)

@John: please don&#039;t hesistate to go the Dojo Forums and post that comment in a big way.  More people that work on Dojo pay attention there than they do here.

@Vance: tell me about it :)

@rip747: You are always entitled to your own personal preferences.  But don&#039;t make a judgement like &quot;sounds like desperation&quot; when you don&#039;t know anything about what went on internally with the Dojo group.  We heard all of the complaints, we took a step back--and a very long, hard look--and finally we had the example of Firefox as inspiration.  In short, we responded to the complaints.  The problem (as I see it) is that we didn&#039;t respond instantly, and while that&#039;s a problem it&#039;s also inevitable that it takes a while to turn a project around as radically as we did.  If you felt that we pushed you away, we&#039;re sorry about that--but we&#039;re all volunteers and can&#039;t respond to everyone and everything that someone says instantly (though I&#039;d admit that some of us try, usually to the detriment of the project).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@r: Ah.  You&#8217;re referring to the 0.4 branch.  AFAIK we&#8217;re only providing one download for 0.9, and we&#8217;ll be working hard to try to make it remain that way (since I completely agree with you about the whole 20 editions thing ;)</p>
<p>@John: please don&#8217;t hesistate to go the Dojo Forums and post that comment in a big way.  More people that work on Dojo pay attention there than they do here.</p>
<p>@Vance: tell me about it :)</p>
<p>@rip747: You are always entitled to your own personal preferences.  But don&#8217;t make a judgement like &#8220;sounds like desperation&#8221; when you don&#8217;t know anything about what went on internally with the Dojo group.  We heard all of the complaints, we took a step back&#8211;and a very long, hard look&#8211;and finally we had the example of Firefox as inspiration.  In short, we responded to the complaints.  The problem (as I see it) is that we didn&#8217;t respond instantly, and while that&#8217;s a problem it&#8217;s also inevitable that it takes a while to turn a project around as radically as we did.  If you felt that we pushed you away, we&#8217;re sorry about that&#8211;but we&#8217;re all volunteers and can&#8217;t respond to everyone and everything that someone says instantly (though I&#8217;d admit that some of us try, usually to the detriment of the project).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: landmammal</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252502</link>
		<dc:creator>landmammal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252502</guid>
		<description>I selected YUI for our team about 5 months ago.  We are really happy with it.  

It just seemed the most polished.  The docs are great.  That is more important than people realize.  I want to get it working, tell me how, fast, and give me examples.  YUI does this.  Feature wise all of these guys have useful stuff so no real winner.  YUI also is organized very well.  Dojo was a close second though.  And we aren&#039;t opposed to using other libs on a case by case bases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I selected YUI for our team about 5 months ago.  We are really happy with it.  </p>
<p>It just seemed the most polished.  The docs are great.  That is more important than people realize.  I want to get it working, tell me how, fast, and give me examples.  YUI does this.  Feature wise all of these guys have useful stuff so no real winner.  YUI also is organized very well.  Dojo was a close second though.  And we aren&#8217;t opposed to using other libs on a case by case bases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rip747</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252499</link>
		<dc:creator>rip747</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252499</guid>
		<description>I tried to use Dojo in the past and it was such a hog and crashed my browser every time it loaded. Iâ€™ll take youâ€™re word that 0.9 is great and stick with jQuery.

The one thing that I never did like about Dojo was the fact that it was soooooo bloated. I like jQuery because it extremely small and I can extend it with the plugins that I need to get the job done.

This entire post for the Dojo camp sounds like desperation in my book to win back people since they pushed them away. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to use Dojo in the past and it was such a hog and crashed my browser every time it loaded. Iâ€™ll take youâ€™re word that 0.9 is great and stick with jQuery.</p>
<p>The one thing that I never did like about Dojo was the fact that it was soooooo bloated. I like jQuery because it extremely small and I can extend it with the plugins that I need to get the job done.</p>
<p>This entire post for the Dojo camp sounds like desperation in my book to win back people since they pushed them away. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjiv Jivan</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252497</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjiv Jivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 19:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252497</guid>
		<description>My response to this post : http://www.jroller.com/page/sjivan?entry=ext_vs_dojo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My response to this post : <a href="http://www.jroller.com/page/sjivan?entry=ext_vs_dojo" rel="nofollow">http://www.jroller.com/page/sjivan?entry=ext_vs_dojo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Neuberg</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252495</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Neuberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252495</guid>
		<description>John, I really like your list of what kinds of &#039;how-to&#039; tutorials you would want with Dojo; do you have more? What other kinds of &quot;In 3 minutes&quot; docs would folks want to see?

Best,
  Brad Neuberg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I really like your list of what kinds of &#8216;how-to&#8217; tutorials you would want with Dojo; do you have more? What other kinds of &#8220;In 3 minutes&#8221; docs would folks want to see?</p>
<p>Best,<br />
  Brad Neuberg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance Dubberly</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/why-choose-dojo/comment-page-1#comment-252493</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance Dubberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=2553#comment-252493</guid>
		<description>I agree with everybody here about he documentation problem with dojo.  However the lack of documentation seems to be inversely proportional to the amount of code in the framework. While most frameworks have pretty web pages and cute examples, they don&#039;t do very much. Dojo on the other hand provides very little in the way of examples and prettiness but an amazing amount of functionality,  far more than anybody else out here even comes close to.  Sure you can piece together 30 libraries based on prototype and get something that kinda resembles dojo but do you really want to keep track of 30 libraries from 30 different people? 
The biggest problem with the Dojo Foundation is that they don&#039;t sell themselves very well.  But then they are programmers not marketing people... so I guess that comes with the territory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everybody here about he documentation problem with dojo.  However the lack of documentation seems to be inversely proportional to the amount of code in the framework. While most frameworks have pretty web pages and cute examples, they don&#8217;t do very much. Dojo on the other hand provides very little in the way of examples and prettiness but an amazing amount of functionality,  far more than anybody else out here even comes close to.  Sure you can piece together 30 libraries based on prototype and get something that kinda resembles dojo but do you really want to keep track of 30 libraries from 30 different people?<br />
The biggest problem with the Dojo Foundation is that they don&#8217;t sell themselves very well.  But then they are programmers not marketing people&#8230; so I guess that comes with the territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

