http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax Cleaning up the web with Ajax Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:55:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-47963 שש בש באינטרנט Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:24:04 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax#comment-47963 But the html is not the only way But the html is not the only way

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-47961 שש בש באינטרנט Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:21:39 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax#comment-47961 are particularly liked the way he used innerHTML and then document.write in the same function thing. are particularly liked the way he used innerHTML and then document.write in the same function thing.

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-47960 שש בש באינטרנט Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:20:32 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax#comment-47960 I particularly liked the way he used innerHTML and then document.write in the same function. I particularly liked the way he used innerHTML and then document.write in the same function.

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-4080 Tom Trenka Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:04:23 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax#comment-4080 By the way, no offense but I'd suggest that you actually make sure the article in question isn't questionable before posting about it. It's one thing to be talking about new apps and what not, it's something else when you point people at a resource that will spawn all sorts of misunderstanding and bad practices in code. By the way, no offense but I’d suggest that you actually make sure the article in question isn’t questionable before posting about it. It’s one thing to be talking about new apps and what not, it’s something else when you point people at a resource that will spawn all sorts of misunderstanding and bad practices in code.

]]> http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax/comment-page-1#comment-4079 Tom Trenka Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:55:42 +0000 http://ajaxian.com/archives/xml-responses-and-ajax#comment-4079 I'm becoming more and more convinced that there should be some sort of credentials required before someone can post a tutorial about any topic--but specifically "hot" topics like this. I almost puked when I saw some of the code. Give you a hint folks: what's wrong with this picture? <code>... document.getElementById("x1").innerHTML= xhr.responseXML. </code> ...forgetting about the extraneous period at the end of the comment (of course). There's quite a few little lovely bits like this. I particularly liked the way he used innerHTML and then document.write in the same function. If anything, this is a great example of how <b>not</b> to write JS, and for a community site to actually check an article by someone who knows before publishing it. I’m becoming more and more convinced that there should be some sort of credentials required before someone can post a tutorial about any topic–but specifically “hot” topics like this. I almost puked when I saw some of the code. Give you a hint folks: what’s wrong with this picture?
...
document.getElementById("x1").innerHTML= xhr.responseXML.

…forgetting about the extraneous period at the end of the comment (of course).
There’s quite a few little lovely bits like this. I particularly liked the way he used innerHTML and then document.write in the same function. If anything, this is a great example of how not to write JS, and for a community site to actually check an article by someone who knows before publishing it.

]]>