<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! comScore lowers due to outdated page view metric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ajaxian.com/archives/yahoo-comscore-lowers-due-to-outdated-page-view-metric/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/yahoo-comscore-lowers-due-to-outdated-page-view-metric</link>
	<description>Cleaning up the web with Ajax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:43:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ehrenberg</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/yahoo-comscore-lowers-due-to-outdated-page-view-metric/comment-page-1#comment-245236</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ehrenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1924#comment-245236</guid>
		<description>I agree. There really should be something done about the ranking of pages now that AJAX is making the common &#039;click a link, load new page&#039; model to be not very attractive to users. Ajax makes for a better expeience for the users, sure. But what about the servers? When used correctly, Ajax has the potential to greatly reduce server traffic by only sending a full page once, and updating small pieces of the page here and there. With all that&#039;s happened on the web lately, I really do feel that there needs to be a better way of determining real traffic or just plane popularity of a site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. There really should be something done about the ranking of pages now that AJAX is making the common &#8216;click a link, load new page&#8217; model to be not very attractive to users. Ajax makes for a better expeience for the users, sure. But what about the servers? When used correctly, Ajax has the potential to greatly reduce server traffic by only sending a full page once, and updating small pieces of the page here and there. With all that&#8217;s happened on the web lately, I really do feel that there needs to be a better way of determining real traffic or just plane popularity of a site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Platti</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/yahoo-comscore-lowers-due-to-outdated-page-view-metric/comment-page-1#comment-245224</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Platti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1924#comment-245224</guid>
		<description>Clearly sites that let you do more with less page views is a better experience, but that misses the point.   

The main thing to notice here is that Ajax does not have an acceptable usage measurement that business people can understand.   Advertisers who dont understand the benefits of Ajax (and dont want to) will now go to MySpace to advertise on the &quot;biggest site on the internet&quot;.  

Remember, in technology, better doesnt always win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly sites that let you do more with less page views is a better experience, but that misses the point.   </p>
<p>The main thing to notice here is that Ajax does not have an acceptable usage measurement that business people can understand.   Advertisers who dont understand the benefits of Ajax (and dont want to) will now go to MySpace to advertise on the &#8220;biggest site on the internet&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Remember, in technology, better doesnt always win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georges</title>
		<link>http://ajaxian.com/archives/yahoo-comscore-lowers-due-to-outdated-page-view-metric/comment-page-1#comment-245213</link>
		<dc:creator>Georges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajaxian.com/?p=1924#comment-245213</guid>
		<description>Having a overwhelming amount of page views often indicates one thing: That the site is NOT user friendly!

If you have to clickt trough 10 pages to see all comments of an article, or haveing to click trough 4 categories to find the right article in your favorite online store is just horrible.

Ajax can just make your life so much more comfortable. Having a live search that is being displayed on the same page, or having a nice ajax comment-slider makes a webpage more friendly.

And there are still ways to measure what visitors are watching and requesting on a page using Ajax!

You just have to think differently...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a overwhelming amount of page views often indicates one thing: That the site is NOT user friendly!</p>
<p>If you have to clickt trough 10 pages to see all comments of an article, or haveing to click trough 4 categories to find the right article in your favorite online store is just horrible.</p>
<p>Ajax can just make your life so much more comfortable. Having a live search that is being displayed on the same page, or having a nice ajax comment-slider makes a webpage more friendly.</p>
<p>And there are still ways to measure what visitors are watching and requesting on a page using Ajax!</p>
<p>You just have to think differently&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

